Re: [lfs-dev] standalone-udev

2012-10-02 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Ken Moffat wrote: > (changing the subject) > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:32:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> I see that Bryan has a 'fork' of standalone udev (I guess that just >> means his own branch), and at least one of his commits has gone >> into standalone. Yeah, my own branch. (Side note

Re: [lfs-dev] standalone-udev

2012-10-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:42:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken, I'm not sure I follow. At least in -193, there is no autogen.sh. > I can't find a standalone-udev tarball with google. I also think our > methodology is a bit cleaner, especially since BLFS builds gudev and > keymap (fro

Re: [lfs-dev] standalone-udev

2012-10-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > (changing the subject) > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:32:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> I see that Bryan has a 'fork' of standalone udev (I >> guess that just means his own branch), and at least one of his >> commits has gone into standalone. > > If anyone wants to play