2012/12/28 Matt Burgess :
> On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:27 +0800, xinglp wrote:
>
>> I sure we need to change HAVE___SECURE_GETENV to HAVE_SECURE_GETENV in
>> udev-lfs-196-3/cfg.h when update to glibc-2.17.
>
> It's in the updated udev-lfs-196-4 that I updated in the same commit as
> Glibc-2.17.
Sorry
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:27 +0800, xinglp wrote:
> I sure we need to change HAVE___SECURE_GETENV to HAVE_SECURE_GETENV in
> udev-lfs-196-3/cfg.h when update to glibc-2.17.
It's in the updated udev-lfs-196-4 that I updated in the same commit as
Glibc-2.17.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscr
2012/12/27 Bruce Dubbs :
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:37 PM, xinglp wrote:
>
>> 2. And for the udev-lfs the below command:
>> sed -i -e 's/HAVE___SECURE_GETENV/HAVE_SECURE_GETENV/' udev-lfs-196-3/cfg.h
>
> If we decide we need this, we'll just make a udev-lfs-196-4 tarball.
I sure we need to chang
On 12/26/2012 02:37 PM, xinglp wrote:
> 1. Just disable the two patches of glibc-2.16. (They are rejected, maybe
> need update to fit glibc-2.17, I'm not very sure.)
I checked - both of those have been applied in 2.17 so those patches can
just be dropped. Also, the sed command for rpc/types.h is
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:37 PM, xinglp wrote:
> 2. And for the udev-lfs the below command:
> sed -i -e 's/HAVE___SECURE_GETENV/HAVE_SECURE_GETENV/' udev-lfs-196-3/cfg.h
If we decide we need this, we'll just make a udev-lfs-196-4 tarball.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi
