On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:09:48PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > The build system of kbd is clever enough to reconfigure itself!
> > *very_weird*. BUT, the required videomodes files are missing.
>
> For the record -- automake-generated Makefiles contain rules to rerun
> the
Ken Moffat wrote:
> The build system of kbd is clever enough to reconfigure itself!
> *very_weird*. BUT, the required videomodes files are missing.
For the record -- automake-generated Makefiles contain rules to rerun
the bits of autofoo that are required whenever the source files change.
So if
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:45:04AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> A very old document at
> http://luv.asn.au/overheads/virtualconsoles.html#fonts
> suggests that the command 'restoretextmode -w COLSxROWS' (e.g.
> 132xSomething) is needed to create these files, but I don't have
> such a command.
>
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 00:45 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> A very old document at
> http://luv.asn.au/overheads/virtualconsoles.html#fonts
> suggests that the command 'restoretextmode -w COLSxROWS' (e.g.
> 132xSomething) is needed to create these files, but I don't have
> such a command.
Apparently,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:20:34AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11:34AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > There is a patch in the OpenSuse srpm, against configure.ac - I can
> > see them applying it, but I don't see what sort of autofoo they use
> > to update configure. W
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11:34AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> There is a patch in the OpenSuse srpm, against configure.ac - I can
> see them applying it, but I don't see what sort of autofoo they use
> to update configure. Weird, but since it has gone upstream I look
> at using sed on configur
On Fri, 11 May 2012 00:11:47 +0100
Ken Moffat wrote:
> But looking at upstream git it's already
> fixed in configure.ac:
>
> case $host_cpu in
> i?86*) RESIZECONS_PROGS=yes ;;
> x86_64*) RESIZECONS_PROGS=yes ;;
> *) RESIZECONS_PROGS=no ;;
> esac
>
> There is a patc
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:56:08PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:14:43PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> >
> > This looks, at a quick glance, to be an upstream bug. xinglp, Ken, have
> > you contacted them yet?
> >
>
> My first step will be to compare what happened in olde
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:14:43PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 21:47 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:06:55AM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> > > As described at
> > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/kbd.html
> > >
> > > But the m
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 21:47 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:06:55AM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> > As described at
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/kbd.html
> >
> > But the manpage of resizecons was installed.
>
> Looking back, 7.1 did the same (
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:06:55AM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> As described at
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/kbd.html
>
> But the manpage of resizecons was installed.
Looking back, 7.1 did the same (manpage but no program).
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das an
11 matches
Mail list logo
