On 2/4/12 9:21 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> If you choose not to make the changes, then it's probably better to at
> least specify /bin/bash in the scripts, instead of pretending like
> they're portable via /bin/sh.
Ugh, I seem to have a knack for expressing myself badly - I reread this
and had t
On 2/4/12 8:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> rc.site uses $() in two places. I don't think that's portable.
Actually, I believe that is fine. See:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_06_03
> To be honest, I'm not sure I want to restrict the scripts to a
> l
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 2/4/12 8:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> If you know of any issues it the current scripts, let me know.
>
> Off the top of my head, the use of 'echo -e' and 'echo -n' is not
> handled the same in every shell. Switching those to printf "...\n" and
> printf "..." respectiv
On 2/4/12 8:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> If you know of any issues it the current scripts, let me know.
Off the top of my head, the use of 'echo -e' and 'echo -n' is not
handled the same in every shell. Switching those to printf "...\n" and
printf "..." respectively is more universal.
In my scri
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Yes, the difference in complexity I was referring to was not really how
> complex an LFS system could become, but rather between our typically
> sparse function libraries/scripts and that of a satisfy-everyone distro.
> Apparently in Ubuntu, the switch to dash as sh for
On 2/4/12 7:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> In other words, whether it's bash or dash or ash, the shell program is
> only read in from disk once for all the bootscripts. The only other
> difference is the time it takes to actually run the scripts. For our
> scripts that are generally about 5-10 state
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 2/4/12 4:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Increased or decreased? How much?
>
> Sorry, yes, decreased.
>
> Hmm, but with already minimal systems like ours, apparently not enough
> to really matter. I hadn't accurately measured the difference between
> bash and dash on t
On 2/4/12 4:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Increased or decreased? How much?
Sorry, yes, decreased.
Hmm, but with already minimal systems like ours, apparently not enough
to really matter. I hadn't accurately measured the difference between
bash and dash on the bootscripts until you asked but I d
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 2/3/12 2:02 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> and all 18 lines of output in boot.log are done in 3 seconds. Since
>> udev is started at 1.08 seconds, that's 4 seconds to the login prompt
>> form the grub selection.
>
> Yep, I am experiencing the same with LightCube OS. About
On 2/3/12 2:02 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> and all 18 lines of output in boot.log are done in 3 seconds. Since
> udev is started at 1.08 seconds, that's 4 seconds to the login prompt
> form the grub selection.
Yep, I am experiencing the same with LightCube OS. About 4 seconds to
login prompt, incl
10 matches
Mail list logo
