Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-06-06 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
On 06-06-2012 13:17, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:57:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > [...] > So, LFS uses Linus' non-RC mainline releases when they come out, followed by > Greg K-H's stable releases up until Linus' next non-RC mainline release is > made. > > Regards, > > Mat

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-06-06 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:57:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I suggest this topic be dropped as moot. The discussion doesn't add > anything and we are agreed that today 3.4.1 is the latest stable version. On the contrary, I think it's important that folks here understand a bit about the kernel deve

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-06-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em qua, 6/6/12, Andrew Benton escreveu: > >> De: Andrew Benton >> Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build >> Para: lfs-dev >> Data: Quarta-feira, 6 de Junho de 2012, 7:52 >> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +0

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-06-06 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qua, 6/6/12, Andrew Benton escreveu: > De: Andrew Benton > Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build > Para: lfs-dev > Data: Quarta-feira, 6 de Junho de 2012, 7:52 > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +0100 > Fernando de Oliveira > wrote: [...] >

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-06-06 Thread Andrew Benton
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > I have built linux-3.4.1 in five machines. No problems, as with the > unstable 3.4.0, which required a patch or sed for one of the machines. > > One can see in https://www.kernel.org/: > > "Latest Stable Kernel: > Download >

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-06-05 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I have built linux-3.4.1 in five machines. No problems, as with the unstable 3.4.0, which required a patch or sed for one of the machines. I repeat being grateful to all editors and contributors of (B)LFS. With most respect, write the following lines to defend myself. One can see in https://www.k

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
On 29-05-2012 21:04, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: [...] > Yes, I do have it enabled in all 5 machines. [...] I will try to > find differences and similarities between them. LFS6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 7.0 and 7.1. Some are svn versions after the respective version. Problem appeared building kernel 3.4.0

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
On 29-05-2012 14:51, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:07:38AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >>> Digging into this since yesterday evening, discovered first that 3.4 is >>> dev and stable version is 3.3.7, seco

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 29 May 2012 17:52:34 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Now, I see i forgot the patch? Please, find it attached If you decide to use it (3.4 compiles fine for me BTW), the change could be made with a sed: sed -i '/__iommu_table/a\\t"(jiffies|jiffies_64)|"' \ arch/x86/tools/relocs.c

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:07:38AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Fernando de Oliveira > wrote: > > > Digging into this since yesterday evening, discovered first that 3.4 is > > dev and stable version is 3.3.7, second, the error is well known: > > > >

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em ter, 29/5/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > >> I am grateful for your contributions to us all using >> (B)LFS. > > Perhaps a better word would thankful. Hope you understand what I mean For those of us working with many people around the world and who also

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 29/5/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build > Para: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Maio de 2012, 13:33 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > Finally, this morn

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 29/5/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > I am grateful for your contributions to us all using > (B)LFS. Perhaps a better word would thankful. Hope you understand what I mean []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Finally, this morning, re-read with care the message: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg20578.html > > and made a patch. Build succeeded with the attached patch, which was > applied with > > patch -Np1 -i > /home/fernando/sshfs/lfs/linux-3.4-relocs-ad

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 29/5/12, Matthew Burgess escreveu: > De: Matthew Burgess > Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build > Para: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Maio de 2012, 13:07 > On Tue, 29 May 2012 09:02:17 -0700 > (PDT),

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build

2012-05-29 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Tue, 29 May 2012 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Digging into this since yesterday evening, discovered first that 3.4 is > dev and stable version is 3.3.7, second, the error is well known: > > http://us.generation-nt.com/answer/linux-next-build-failure-after-merge-final-t