Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 16:18 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll look at that when I finish with the LFS portion. I'm learning
>> quite a bit about the new and wonderful world of Makefiles. :)
>
> New? Wonderful? Bruce, I think you've been hammering BLFS too hard just
> re
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 16:18 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> OK, I'll look at that when I finish with the LFS portion. I'm learning
> quite a bit about the new and wonderful world of Makefiles. :)
New? Wonderful? Bruce, I think you've been hammering BLFS too hard just
recently and need to take a bre
Armin K. wrote:
> On 07/13/2012 10:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
>>
>> Are you going to get glibc today?
>>
>> I've been working on udev/systemd. I can build everything and am
>> working on the install. I'll package things out and post the changes
>> here. It's pretty
On 07/13/2012 10:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
>
> Are you going to get glibc today?
>
> I've been working on udev/systemd. I can build everything and am
> working on the install. I'll package things out and post the changes
> here. It's pretty involved so I'd like to g
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 15:24 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
>
> Are you going to get glibc today?
No. I've got a work in progress patch, which handles all of Andy's
observations prior to the chapter 5 diffutils breakage. At that point I
tried to figure out why the gets()
