Rob Landley wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 09:54:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
>> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>>
>> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
>> inconsistency. Trying to parse
On 05/03/2013 09:54:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
> inconsistency. Trying to parse versions is quite package
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Bruce Dubbs" À: "LFS Developers
>> Mailinglist" Envoyé: Samedi 4 Mai
>> 2013 18:13:35 Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] Latest packages
>>
>>
>> Actually, I want to know if a xz ve
- Mail original -
> De: "Bruce Dubbs"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Samedi 4 Mai 2013 18:13:35
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] Latest packages
>
>
> Actually, I want to know if a xz version exists. My order of preference
> is xz,
Hi,
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
>>
>> Current solution (that I'm happy with for quite some years):
>> All parsing stuff is done by a simple single C(++?) program now.
>> It basically follows _all_ links and handles general stuff like stripping
>> commo
dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2013, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
>> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
> I'm kind of doing that for a couple of years now (including some BLFS and
> even Wi
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Not sure it is helpful for what you want to do, but I have met some related
> difficulties for the ablfs projects (extension of jhalfs to BLFS):
>
> Actually, some BLFS packages have added problems compared
> to LFS (think of CDParanoia-III-10.2 or PSUtils-p17, for example
Aleksey Rybalkin wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:54:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
>> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>>
>> Has anyone else looked at this?
>
> Hi. I wrote something like that not long
Matt Burgess wrote:
> The furthest I got was producing
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~matthew/lfs_packages.html
Looks like a very nice start.
> From there, I
> did intend to write a script to automate what I currently check
> manually, but never got around to it. Given the issues you outlin
Hi,
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
I'm kind of doing that for a couple of years now (including some BLFS and
even Windows stuff as well ;-]). I started with a b
Le 04/05/2013 04:54, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
> inconsistency. Trying to parse versions is quite package
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:54:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> Has anyone else looked at this?
Hi. I wrote something like that not long ago. Here some ideas you
might
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 21:54 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
> inconsistency. Trying to parse versions is qui
13 matches
Mail list logo
