Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-24 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/24/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > M.Canales.es wrote: > > > > Also BLFS should close #2241 to allow editors to install the new DTD on > > their > > hosts. > > Randy has assigned that ticket to himself. I can update quantum and > anduin anytime, but I haven't looked at the proce

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-24 Thread M.Canales.es
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 17:14, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > Randy has assigned that ticket to himself. I can update quantum and > anduin anytime, but I haven't looked at the procedure to do that. > However, I can't imagine it being much different from what we have now. On that ticket there i

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
M.Canales.es wrote: > El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 05:20, Bruce Dubbs escribió: >> Dan Nicholson wrote: >>> Is this still going to happen. Manuel is obviously going to drive any >>> changes, but I think any branches have to be created by Matthew or >>> Bruce. >> Actually, anyone with commit pri

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-24 Thread M.Canales.es
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 05:20, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Is this still going to happen. Manuel is obviously going to drive any > > changes, but I think any branches have to be created by Matthew or > > Bruce. > > Actually, anyone with commit privs can create a tag or

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan Nicholson wrote: > Is this still going to happen. Manuel is obviously going to drive any > changes, but I think any branches have to be created by Matthew or > Bruce. Actually, anyone with commit privs can create a tag or branch. It's just a svn command away. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfrom

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-23 Thread Dan Nicholson
Trying to clean out my inbox a bit and came upon this. On 2/9/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Jueves, 8 de Febrero de 2007 21:49, Matthew Burgess escribió: > > Hi folks, > > > > Do you think it's worth creating a branch so we can work on updating the > > book rendering infrastruct

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-09 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 8 de Febrero de 2007 21:49, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Hi folks, > > Do you think it's worth creating a branch so we can work on updating the > book rendering infrastructure? This way, if we can't get it sorted in time > for a release we simply don't merge from that branch? It also me

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-08 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Matthew Burgess wrote: > Hi folks, > > Do you think it's worth creating a branch so we can work on updating the book > rendering infrastructure? This way, if we can't get it sorted in time for a > release we simply don't merge from that branch? It also means that folks > with an interest in t

Re: RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-08 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/8/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you think it's worth creating a branch so we can work on updating the book > rendering infrastructure? This way, if we can't get it sorted in time for a > release we simply don't merge from that branch? It also means that folks > with a

RFC: Create a new-rendering-tools branch

2007-02-08 Thread Matthew Burgess
Hi folks, Do you think it's worth creating a branch so we can work on updating the book rendering infrastructure? This way, if we can't get it sorted in time for a release we simply don't merge from that branch? It also means that folks with an interest in this can contribute and relieve some