Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
>> now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
>>
>> There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
>> Linux-2.6.32 which has been design
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
> now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
>
> There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
> Linux-2.6.32 which has been designated for long term support.
Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:39:13 +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
>
>> what kind of buildings can do a user exactly
>> with this stable (6.6)? From 64 to 64 bits? From 32 to 32? Or 32 to 64?
>
> Actually, the underlying build method supports all combinations:
>
> 32->32
> 64
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:39:13 +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> what kind of buildings can do a user exactly
> with this stable (6.6)? From 64 to 64 bits? From 32 to 32? Or 32 to 64?
Actually, the underlying build method supports all combinations:
32->32
64->64
32->64
64->32[*]
(* the last o
2010/1/25 Bruce Dubbs :
> Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
> now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
>
> There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
> Linux-2.6.32 which has been designated for long term support.
>On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:42:58 -0600
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> > ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will
> > be easier for me to solve some problems.
> >
> > For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased
> > with knowing
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will be
> easier for me to solve some problems.
>
> For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased with
> knowing precisely this. It will help me to see my translation strategy
> among
ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will be
easier for me to solve some problems.
For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased with
knowing precisely this. It will help me to see my translation strategy
among complex lfs world :)
Last question (sti
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Just a precision because, beyond translating, I manage a French help
> network too. Can you tell me, and I think it could be precised in the
> book or on the website, what kind of buildings can do a user exactly
> with this stable (6.6)? From 64 to 64 bits? From 3
Hi,
Just a precision because, beyond translating, I manage a French help
network too. Can you tell me, and I think it could be precised in the
book or on the website, what kind of buildings can do a user exactly
with this stable (6.6)? From 64 to 64 bits? From 32 to 32? Or 32 to 64?
If I read arch
Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
Linux-2.6.32 which has been designated for long term support.
I am proposing that we make a
11 matches
Mail list logo
