Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> If you feel you can talk about a potential PM candidate for LFS, please
> write up a document that outlines the following:
Slackware-like .tgz
> - it's strengths and weaknesses
+ It is very simple, and everybody is expected to understand the code.
- Out of the box, it
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:54:37 -0700
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really do disagree with this stance. As an educative, as well as
> > practical project, we should show at least one worked example. Just
> > like we do with SysVInit and the bootscripts (which several of us
> > d
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - It has a lot of legacy features that were oriented to the old
> versions of autoconf (see, for example, how the %makeinstall macro
> expands--BTW RedHat doesn't use this macro)
Nobody uses this anymore, but it
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point.
>
> We need a clearly defined list of pros, cons and technical explanations
> plus their limitations of each viable choice - all the information that
> a user needs to make an informed decision while keeping in m
> I really do disagree with this stance. As an educative, as well as
> practical project, we should show at least one worked example. Just
> like we do with SysVInit and the bootscripts (which several of us
> don't ever use any more). No one has to use the example, but the
> example itself shows
2008/3/5, Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you feel you can talk about a potential PM candidate for LFS, please
> write up a document that outlines the following:
OK, deb--in my opinion, not a candidate at all. But let's have it just
for comparison.
> - it's strengths and weaknesses
2008/3/5, Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point. I agree with
> Greg Schafer in that the actual choice of PM is a user's choice in the
> end and shouldn't matter.
Correct.
> About all we should attempt to do is inform the user of all t
DJ Lucas wrote:
> please ream my response
*read
LOL, and on that note, good night.
-- DJ
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
TheOldFellow wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:11:53 -0700
> Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point. I agree with
>> Greg Schafer in that the actual choice of PM is a user's choice in the
>> end and shouldn't matter.
>>
>> About al
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:11:53 -0700
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point. I agree with
> Greg Schafer in that the actual choice of PM is a user's choice in the
> end and shouldn't matter.
>
> About all we should attempt to do is i
The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point. I agree with
Greg Schafer in that the actual choice of PM is a user's choice in the
end and shouldn't matter.
About all we should attempt to do is inform the user of all the main
stream and (perhaps) some of the not-so-mainstream option
11 matches
Mail list logo
