Hi all,
I really don't know how to start and how to finish my email.
For a long time I wanted to explain my current situation, but believe it or
not, I didn't have neither these few minutes of my time.
My/Our life had changed in a such a drastic way that I don't/won't have time
in the near future
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 07/09/06 20:14 CST:
> Jim Gifford wrote:
>> Also, does anyone know what's happened to archaic??
>
> I personally have no clue.
I did notice that he no longer contributes to the project,
however, he does log into the LFS server (quantum) approximately
twice a w
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
> me.
Not like me to agree with Bruce,:-) but in this case...
I'll miss your contributions, Alexander, you are a real professional.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
Alexander E. Patrakov ums.usu.ru> writes:
>
> I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
> me. The reasons are:
Your work has been greatly appreciated.
> 1) I am a troll, because I actually don't use LFS as my primary desktop
> since 2005.
Then that makes me a Fe
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
> me.
Dang. I completely understand why you're doing this, but that doesn't
make it any easier.
Well, I do hope we'll see you again in the future. I also hope you
won't mind making an occasional
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
> me.
I'm sorry, but this is not true, at least from the LFS point of view.
You have contributed a lot. However, I do understand your viewpoint.
Please consider continuing to participate in whate
On 9/13/06, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I decided that I should not give any advice to the LFS project at
> all rather than questionable advice based on Debian and obsolete versions.
Thanks for everything you have done for this project.
Thanks a lot, Alexander. The LFS proj
So, I decided that I should not give any advice to the LFS project at
all rather than questionable advice based on Debian and obsolete versions.
Thanks for everything you have done for this project.
--
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
--
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com
--
http
El Miércoles, 13 de Septiembre de 2006 18:11, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
> me.
I hope that at least you continue sending posts and comments. Your
contributions are very appreciated.
>
> This also means that LFS should
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:11:15PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> So, I decided that I should not give any advice to the LFS project at
> all rather than questionable advice based on Debian and obsolete versions.
>
Alexander, your advice has been invaluable. I hope that in the
future
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:11, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
> me.
I feel sad of the situation in Russia behind Linux and software in
general. Your need for going away is especially painful for me.
Besides, it was wond
I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without
me. The reasons are:
1) I am a troll, because I actually don't use LFS as my primary desktop
since 2005. All LiveCD development on my computer was done from Debian.
Yet I found LFS (actually, an extracted copy of the LiveCD)
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:21:17PM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> It's been a pleasure working with the community for so long. Thanks to
> everyone for making it such an enjoyable and rewarding experience.
>
(just catching up, I've been without connectivity for 10 days)
Matt,
it was a ple
El Sábado, 8 de Julio de 2006 20:21, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> As such, I think my continued involvement with the LFS project is actually
> hindering it more than it is helping. It is therefore with some regret I
> will be resigning from both the LFS-coordinators role and my editors
> position
Jim Gifford wrote:
Also, does anyone know what's happened to archaic??
I personally have no clue.
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscr
Matt,
Like I said to you in my personal email to you when this first came up,
you're always welcome back to the project when you think you can be
involved again. Your help over the last 3.5 years has been invaluable
and greatly appreciated and won't be forgotten.
I hope all goes well with yo
Matt,
I personally will hate to see you leave. It looks like LFS has lost
a lot of developers recently, you were the only piece holding things
together during this transition time of LFS.
I wish you well in your future endeavors.
Also, does anyone know what's happened to archaic??
--
htt
On 7/8/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As such, I think my continued involvement with the LFS project is actually
hindering it more than it is helping. It is therefore with some regret I
will be resigning from both the LFS-coordinators role and my editors
position effective immed
Matthew Burgess wrote:
As you will have already gathered by the lack of progress on the 6.2
release, I've not been committing much time to the LFS project over the
last few months. While there are various reasons for this, they are all
very personal, and I would prefer they remain that way.
As
Hi folks,
As you will have already gathered by the lack of progress on the 6.2
release, I've not been committing much time to the LFS project over the
last few months. While there are various reasons for this, they are all
very personal, and I would prefer they remain that way.
As such, I think
Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> That's it. I'll not say a definitive "good bye" here, but just a "see
> you later"...
>
I meant to reply to this much sooner, sorry for the delay.
Anderson, you've taught me a lot and it's been a pleasure working with
you. Hope you get more free time to LFS in the near
Hi guys,
It's been a (very) long time since I don't post or do anything related
to LFS. The reason is simple: I've been too busy with real life and the
small free time I had I've spent on some other projects...
I apologize if anyone here was expecting my presence on the last couple
of months. Bas
Welcome back, Jeremy!!! I'm very happy to see you back and was hoping
you couldn't stay gone very long - much less forever ;)
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello All,
You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
> As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from one
> of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of
> leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the
> comment that I 'need help'.
>From what ive observed here; that seems like somet
On 10/3/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
> ...
> of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of
> leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the
> comment that I 'need help'.
I'm nt even going to justify the person's reactions wit
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello All,
Hi Jeremy,
I was pleased to see you back. I'm disappointed that not everyone
viewed your useful contributions in the same way.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Richard A Downing wrote:
ppps Follow ups to /dev/null please. (That is if udev/hotplug will give
it the right damn permissions today!)
I'm not the only one having that problem?
s I don't have a shrink really, I'm as sane as you are ;-)
How do you know you're alive?
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello All,
> As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from one
> of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of
> leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the
> comment that I 'need help'.
It wasn't me, ho
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had fully intended to leave LFS ... I wasn't able to keep myself away.
Sounds like an addiction.
>Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs
Since we talked last, I improved my diy-linux scripts to do what I
mentione
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
I think the person who wrote the email needs to grow up and get a life.
So much hostility... :)
I've found that the best way to deal with things like that is, if at all
possible, to refuse to acknowledge that they exist. Never throw good
posts after b
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from
one of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion
of leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the
comment that I 'need help'.
Whoever did this doesn't share th
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:22:03AM -0700, Justin R. Knierim wrote:
>
> I am glad to have you back buddy. Just take it easy and don't over do! :)
Same here.
> Basically, there is one a**hole in every crowd. Don't let it get to ya.
And I doubt that person has the balls to be a man long enough
Everyone has something which takes a large part of their life and
occasionally hedges out other important things. If it's going to be LFS
it's not such a bad way to go. The trick is to not get too stressed out
when you notice other things falling behind.
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
However, (and perhaps this demonstrates the degree to which I love this
project and the work), I wasn't able to keep myself away.
I am glad to have you back buddy. Just take it easy and don't over do! :)
As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox f
Petrus wrote:
Richard Stallman *is* a Communist, despite his protestations to the
contrary.
Who cares if he's Satan or the tooth fairy? You can discuss Animal Farm and whatever you like on LFS Chat http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/mail.html
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-
> Richard Stallman *is* a Communist, despite his protestations to the
> contrary.
I'll be your brief confederate in straying from our
list's topicality, Petrus; you'll notice, however, that the
Communist's appelation is unfashionable these days.
"Bolshevik," I think, would cir
> As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from one
> of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of
> leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the
> comment that I 'need help'.
Jeremy,
I will admit that sort of thing was my main re
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 06:50 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree. I
> have done some work on the LiveCD and yesterday Manuel roused my
> attention with jhalfs and I added some edits. As I mentioned in my
> emails bef
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello All,
You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree.
I have done some work on the LiveCD and yesterday Manuel roused my
attention with jhalfs and I added some edits. As I mentioned in my
emails before to this and other lists, I had fully int
Hello All,
You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree. I
have done some work on the LiveCD and yesterday Manuel roused my
attention with jhalfs and I added some edits. As I mentioned in my
emails before to this and other lists, I had fully intended to leave LFS
entir
40 matches
Mail list logo
