Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Peter wrote: > So this should be added to the NOTE to clarify that is is intentional > and point to the bash reference ??? I have tried to put something that makes sense into the NOTE. See r7798. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I totally fail to understand that last statement. > > Sorry, as you and Manuel rightly pointed out I screwed that last > statement up. Maybe I shouldn't bother with any LFS stuff tonight? :-) > Referri

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Matthew Burgess linuxfromscratch.org> writes: > The quotes are simply wrong in the case of the udev rules as it will > cause the \(newline) sequence to appear in the rules file as-is, which > won't do the right thing, AIUI. So this should be added to the NOTE to clarify that is is intentional

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:33:16PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: Sorry about that complete and utter lie above. It's the other way around, of course. If EOF is unquoted, shell expansion occurs within the here-document. Additionally, as bash(1) states, newline handling diff

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

El Jueves, 21 de Septiembre de 2006 20:33, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Sorry about that complete and utter lie above. It's the other way > around, of course. If EOF is unquoted, shell expansion occurs within > the here-document. Yes. > Additionally, as bash(1) states, newline handling > diff

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:33:16PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > Sorry about that complete and utter lie above. It's the other way > around, of course. If EOF is unquoted, shell expansion occurs within > the here-document. Additionally, as bash(1) states, newline handling > differs betwe

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Matthew Burgess linuxfromscratch.org> writes: > Sorry about that complete and utter lie above. It's the other way > around, of course. If EOF is unquoted, shell expansion occurs within > the here-document. Additionally, as bash(1) states, newline handling > differs between the quoted and un

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Matthew Burgess wrote: Peter wrote: ISTR also some failure that was reported on support due to EOF not being quoted. The only failure you'll get by not quoting EOF is if the contents of the here-document contain shell variables that you want to have expanded. I'd agree that consistency woul

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:00:19PM +, Peter wrote: > > All other examples througout the book > are shown using the quotes, > so consistency is the main reason. > Note also that some of the typos are: > cat >/ > but throughout the book it is: > cat > / > This sounds like another of the "all

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Peter wrote: ISTR also some failure that was reported on support due to EOF not being quoted. The only failure you'll get by not quoting EOF is if the contents of the here-document contain shell variables that you want to have expanded. I'd agree that consistency would be nice to have, and t

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

El Jueves, 21 de Septiembre de 2006 19:32, Peter Ennis escribió: > > cat >/etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << EOF > sbould be: > cat > /etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << "EOF" Not. That EOF must not be quoted to can have each udev rule spited in the book, due layout issues, but dumped on an u

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

Ken Moffat linuxfromscratch.org> writes: > > Peter, why do you think EOF needs to be quoted on the 'cat' line ? > > Ken All other examples througout the book are shown using the quotes, so consistency is the main reason. Note also that some of the typos are: cat >/ but throughout the book it

Re: Minor Typos for cat and EOF

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:32:21AM -0700, Peter Ennis wrote: > > LFS 6.2 Stable > > 7.12.1. CD-ROM symlinks > > cat >/etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << EOF > sbould be: > cat > /etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << "EOF" > [ snip more of the same ] Peter, why do you think EOF needs to be quot

Minor Typos for cat and EOF

LFS 6.2 Stable 7.12.1. CD-ROM symlinks cat >/etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << EOF sbould be: cat > /etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << "EOF" The second approach yields: cat >/etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rules << EOF should be: The second approach yields: cat > /etc/udev/rules.d/82-cdrom.rule

Re: Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

Bruce Dubbs wrote: Peter Ennis wrote: Does it automatically get sent to the dev list when entered via Trac Yes. More accurately, Peter, Trac notifications go to the lfs-book list, as do Subversion commits. Practically speaking, there is no difference as editors are subscribed to both lf

Re: Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

Peter Ennis wrote: > Does it automatically get sent to the dev list when entered > via Trac Yes. or should I do that also? No. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

Dan Nicholson gmail.com> writes: > Maybe > Alexander knows better. Here's one way to do it. > > $ ls -l /sys/class/net/*/device > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2006-08-29 06:50 /sys/class/net/eth0/device > -> ../../../devices/pci:00/:00:0f.0 > > $ udevinfo -a -p /class/net/eth0 ...> > loo

Re: Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

Matthew Burgess linuxfromscratch.org> writes: > > Peter, > > Would you mind putting this issue in Trac [0] please? > [0] http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/newticket > OK. I will go through the posts and add them as "Enhancement", or whatever seems appropriate, to Trac. Does it automati

Re: Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

On 8/29/06, Peter Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: LFS 6.2 Capitalization Issue: = 7.13.1. Creating stable names for network interfaces ^ ^ ^ ^ Thanks. Udev Stuff: === Reading section 7.13.1 it mentions "If you are going to

Re: Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

Peter Ennis wrote: LFS 6.2 Capitalization Issue: = 7.13.1. Creating stable names for network interfaces ^ ^ ^ ^ Udev Stuff: === Reading section 7.13.1 it mentions "If you are going to use the bus position as a key, create Udev r

Udev Network Interfaces and minor typos

LFS 6.2 Capitalization Issue: = 7.13.1. Creating stable names for network interfaces ^ ^ ^ ^ Udev Stuff: === Reading section 7.13.1 it mentions "If you are going to use the bus position as a key, create Udev rules similar to the

Re: Minor Typos

Peter Ennis wrote: > 1. Case discrepancy: > 2. Case discrepancies: Thanks Peter. Fixed in r7778. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Minor Typos

LFS 6.2 1. Case discrepancy: 7.5. Configuring the setclock Script 7.7. Configuring the sysklogd script ^^ 7.10. Configuring the localnet Script 7.13. Configuring the network Script 2. Case discrepancies: 7. Setting Up System Bootscripts 7.3. How Do T

Minor typos

Beyond Linux From Scratch - Version svn-20060809 Part II. Post LFS Configuration and Extra Software http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/config.html#postlfs-config-bootdisk Creating a Bootable CD-ROM A hint that describes the instructions for creating this ISO imate