Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Gottfried Haider wrote: Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn. so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I understand you correctly? This applies only to this particula

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Son, 2005-12-25 at 17:22 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Gottfried Haider wrote: > > >I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus > >Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6. > > > >I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running a

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Gottfried Haider
> Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn. so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I understand you correctly? thanks|happy holidays Gottfried Haider -- http://linuxfromscratch

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Gottfried Haider wrote: Hello list, I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6. I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-H

Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Gottfried Haider
Hello list, I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6. I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-Headers-svn) into the header