On 19-Mar-05 14:50, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On March 18, 2005 03:37 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> traceroute and ping results for the following two IP addresses:
>> current server: 216.171.238.83
>> new server: 72.29.236.37
Here's a set of fairly interesting results. The first set from work--a
On March 19, 2005 03:49 pm, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Not from Texas:
It seems the bottleneck is the xo.net network. Things are seemingly fine until
the trace jumps onto their network. I'll keep an eye out on this. From what i
can tell it's not supposed to be *that* slow to that network and general
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
On March 18, 2005 03:37 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
traceroute and ping results for the following two IP addresses:
current server: 216.171.238.83
new server: 72.29.236.37
Thanks for all the results so far. Everybody is showing less hops and lower
ping times to the new server
On March 18, 2005 03:37 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> traceroute and ping results for the following two IP addresses:
> current server: 216.171.238.83
> new server: 72.29.236.37
Thanks for all the results so far. Everybody is showing less hops and lower
ping times to the new server, both Contine
Hi guys,
Been busy here getting the network upgrades rolled out. The new work server is
up and running and is being put through its paces. So far I'm happy with the
connection. I just downloaded a kernel at the full 1.25 MB/sec (10 Mbit)
available speed. The connection Belgarath (the LFS server
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi guys,
>
> The LFS server is definitely getting old and slow and nobody would
> complain if something gets done about it. So, something is about to be
> done about it.
>
Good news - not that I've noticed any performance
Hi guys,
The LFS server is definitely getting old and slow and nobody would complain if
something gets done about it. So, something is about to be done about it.
I am going through some upgrades here at work. Our main router is going to be
replaced as part of our network upgrade roll-outs. I de
