On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:37:24AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I agree totally that trying to introduce multilib into LFS would be
> very difficult for us right now. I wasn't trying to say we should. In
> fact, I probably shouldn't have commented to the thread at all. But I
> wasn't sure if the
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/12/08 09:28 CST:
> I suppose, at some point, we might want to be able to do multilib. But,
> at least when I started the branch, it was felt that we'd be better off
> just approaching a 64-bit only build. Whenever we do feel like adding
> multilib, build not
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:06:59AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Marc McLaughlin (LUSYN) wrote these words on 05/12/08 06:39 CST:
> > Also, is anyone interested in my build notes? I've noted the changes to
> > the 6.3 build to get a working x86-64 build.
>
> I also have the changes required to b
Marc McLaughlin (LUSYN) wrote:
> Out of interest, which bootloaders mentioned by Jeremy for LFS 7.0 will
> work with x86-64? I only managed to get my x86-64 LFS build booting
> with EXTLINUX.
LILO, Grub2.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: htt
Marc McLaughlin (LUSYN) wrote these words on 05/12/08 06:39 CST:
> Out of interest, which bootloaders mentioned by Jeremy for LFS 7.0 will
> work with x86-64? I only managed to get my x86-64 LFS build booting
> with EXTLINUX.
I really don't have a good answer to your question, as I'm guessing
yo
Hi all,
Out of interest, which bootloaders mentioned by Jeremy for LFS 7.0 will
work with x86-64? I only managed to get my x86-64 LFS build booting
with EXTLINUX.
Also, is anyone interested in my build notes? I've noted the changes to
the 6.3 build to get a working x86-64 build.
Rgds,
Marc
L
On May 9, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I haven't piped in on this at all, but I'd just like to say that I
really, really want to be pro-grub2. I periodically peruse the
grub-devel archives hoping to see that a 2.0 release is imminent. I
find it ridiculous that there's no currently sup
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think that the prevailing attitude here is rather anti GRUB2. Mostly
> > because development on it seems to focus on items perceived
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that the prevailing attitude here is rather anti GRUB2. Mostly
> because development on it seems to focus on items perceived as useless
> and bloat for a boot loader.
I haven't piped in on this at all, but I'd j
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> you know .. I really like the atmosphere in the LFS project.
> Such a nice bunch of people.
Oh, we've had our moments. You don't even have to go very far back in
the archives to read some. :(
But I think, on the whole, we all prefer a nicer, friendlier atmosphere,
and we
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
> > working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
> > the boot loader issue .. eventually.
>
> Don't
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
> working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
> the boot loader issue .. eventually.
Don't apologize. :) Dropping in is welcome.
> Just FYI.
Thanks for the reminder, Dennis. I'll
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > In any case, I don't see a reason that there won't be a LFS 6.4 or 7.0
> release
> > sometime this summer.
>
> At the current rate, if we do LFS 7.0 this summer it would have to be
> sans packa
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> To be current, I'd also like to see the Udev blocker sorted out before
>> we release 7.0. See: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057
>
> Since I see a mention of udev:
>
> Over t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> To be current, I'd also like to see the Udev blocker sorted out before
> we release 7.0. See: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057
Since I see a mention of udev:
Over the past couple weeks, I've started to l
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> In any case, I don't see a reason that there won't be a LFS 6.4 or 7.0
> release
> sometime this summer.
At the current rate, if we do LFS 7.0 this summer it would have to be
sans package manager.
However, x86_64 support (and PowerPC, for that matter) is pretty much
ready
16 matches
Mail list logo
