Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort.
>>>
>
>
>> Yeah, actually. 6.4 sounds good to me.
>>
>
> OK, I have fleshed out the description of 6.4 and 7.0.
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/
Hi Bruce,
On Sun, Oct 05, at 12:49 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> That seems reasonable.It
> would not be hard to branch a 6.3.1 from 6.3 and commit changes to that as
> appropriate. I'm not sure what the release procedures should be. Do we do
> a
> -rc1, etc for a minor errata change? I am thin
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort.
> Yeah, actually. 6.4 sounds good to me.
OK, I have fleshed out the description of 6.4 and 7.0.
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/roadmap
I've set a tentative target date of 6.4 as November 1 w
On Sun, Oct 05, at 03:00 DJ Lucas wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort. It can be
> > removed if
> > the consensus is that what we are currently working should be 7.0.
> >
> > My understanding is that we are updating the packages currently i
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort. It can be removed
> if
> the consensus is that what we are currently working should be 7.0.
>
> My understanding is that we are updating the packages currently in the book,
> but
> no major changes are being made
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:09:56 -0500
Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort. It can be removed
> if
> the consensus is that what we are currently working should be 7.0.
>
> My understanding is that we are updating the packages current
I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort. It can be removed
if
the consensus is that what we are currently working should be 7.0.
My understanding is that we are updating the packages currently in the book,
but
no major changes are being made yet. If we do 6.4 and then pro
