On 7/19/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> I suppose for now, we should just add "has_journal" to the list since
> that will be there by default for ext3. This needs a bit more
> investigation (at least for me). If an ext3 guru comes along, maybe
> they'll correct
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> >
>> > it seems that the
>> > supported features for the way we build e2fsprogs-1.39 is:
>> >
>> > dir_prealloc, has_journal, imagic_inodes, ext_attr, dir_index,
>> > resize_inode, lazy_bg, sparse_s
On 7/19/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> it seems that the
> supported features for the way we build e2fsprogs-1.39 is:
>
> dir_prealloc, has_journal, imagic_inodes, ext_attr, dir_index,
> resize_inode, lazy_bg, sparse_super, large_file, filetype,
> needs_recove
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/17/06, George Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think that this note in the book should be updated to show that the
>> > has_journal output is expected, as it should be with an ext3
>> filesystem.
>>
>>
On 7/17/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/17/06, George Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that this note in the book should be updated to show that the
> has_journal output is expected, as it should be with an ext3 filesystem.
Good point, George. I think this happened
On 7/17/06, George Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that this note in the book should be updated to show that the
has_journal output is expected, as it should be with an ext3 filesystem.
Good point, George. I think this happened because the book just
switched recently from telling peo
Hi,
I have just started going through the new 6.2-pre1 book. I noticed that in
section 2.3 "Creating a File System on the Partition" you are asked to
create an ext3 filesystem.
Following this command is a note about unsupported features in some versions
of E2fsprogs. Following the note you are