On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:08:54AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> zzf...@embarqmail.com wrote:
>
> > I tried LFS-6.6 using the development jhalfs tool. It built without error.
> > Comparing my test log with the above reference, I had the same 8 libmudflap
> > failures , but didn't have the other 4. Wh
zzf...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:36:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've been analyzing the test errors found when I was building LFS-6.6.
>> The logs are at
>>
>>http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.6/
>>
>
> I tried LFS-6.6 using the development jhalfs
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:36:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been analyzing the test errors found when I was building LFS-6.6.
> The logs are at
>
>http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.6/
>
I tried LFS-6.6 using the development jhalfs tool. It built without error.
Compari
Ken Moffat wrote:
> sed-4.2.1
>
> 4 failures
> FAIL: utf8-1
> FAIL: utf8-2
> FAIL: utf8-3
> FAIL: utf8-4
>
> (these are testing case conversion (\u and \U)
> for cyrillic
I saw this when I had LC_ALL=C on the host. The sed test script only
sets individual LC_* variables that it thinks will aff
On 1 March 2010 23:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been analyzing the test errors found when I was building LFS-6.6.
> The logs are at
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.6/
>
> This is a summary:
Thanks for this, it confirms and explains some of what I've found
in my own x86_64
I've been analyzing the test errors found when I was building LFS-6.6.
The logs are at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.6/
This is a summary:
glibc
annexc - long time errors that can be ignored.
tst-cpuclock2 - this seems to be triggered by a setting in the
kernel fo
