Re: LFS-6.3 status update

2007-03-21 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 21 de Marzo de 2007 19:09, Matthew Burgess escribió: > > Wow, sorry about that. I could have sworn I'd done that already. Anyway, > it's done now. Verified and confirmed that the catalog resolution works. Thanks. Working on the commit now... -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario d

Re: LFS-6.3 status update

2007-03-21 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 17:57, M.Canales.es wrote: > > #1893 (docbook-4.5) has a patch > > available so that's a no-brainer really. > > Looks like it is not installed yet on quantum :-? Wow, sorry about that. I could have sworn I'd done that already. Anyway, it's done now. > I will made th

Re: LFS-6.3 status update

2007-03-21 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 21 de Marzo de 2007 02:05, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Hi folks, > > Progress appears to being made toward a 6.3 release. We currently have 9 > tickets to resolve before we can push another release out[0]. Great :-) > I'm happy to postpone the rendering toolchain related bugs #1947

Re: LFS-6.3 status update

2007-03-20 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/20/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Progress appears to being made toward a 6.3 release. We currently have 9 > tickets to resolve before we can push another release out[0]. Yeah, that'd be great. > I'm happy to postpone the rendering toolchain related bugs #1947 (fop-0.93)

LFS-6.3 status update

2007-03-20 Thread Matthew Burgess
Hi folks, Progress appears to being made toward a 6.3 release. We currently have 9 tickets to resolve before we can push another release out[0]. I'm happy to postpone the rendering toolchain related bugs #1947 (fop-0.93) and its dependency of #1956 (docbook-xsl-1.72.1) if upstream aren't in a