Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: A tagged branch eh? That's a new one on me :-) Sure, I make my own terms up all the time. You never noticed? ;) -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Thomas Reitelbach
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:33, Archaic wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Thomas Reitelbach wrote: > > My general.ent from LFS/branches/6.1.1/BOOK still says: > > Use the tag, not the branch. Ah... svn switch svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/tags/6.1.1/BOOK/ is my friend

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:35:47PM +, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > Which begs a question...we can get rid of the branch now, right? Correct. If the branch is needed for some as yet unexpected 6.1.2 branch, then it's existence in the current revision is still of no value. Just update trunk/OLD_B

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Unless you checked out the repository new you will have an incorrect version. A new tagged branch was created to house the released 6.1.1 A tagged branch eh? That's a new one on me :-) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscra

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Thomas Reitelbach wrote: My general.ent from LFS/branches/6.1.1/BOOK still says: Is this my failure or did someone forget to update the file general.ent? I'm using anonymous svn, probably it's a few hours behind? Unless you checked out the repository new you will have an incorrect version.

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
Archaic wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Thomas Reitelbach wrote: My general.ent from LFS/branches/6.1.1/BOOK still says: Use the tag, not the branch. Which begs a question...we can get rid of the branch now, right? And doing so would prevent confusion, right? i.e. branc

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Thomas Reitelbach wrote: > > My general.ent from LFS/branches/6.1.1/BOOK still says: Use the tag, not the branch. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/h

Re: LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Thomas Reitelbach
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:16, Matthew Burgess wrote: > The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of > LFS 6.1.1. This release includes fixes for all known errata since > LFS-6.1 was released 4 months ago. > > You can read the book online at > http://www.linuxfromscr

LFS-6.1.1 released

2005-11-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of LFS 6.1.1. This release includes fixes for all known errata since LFS-6.1 was released 4 months ago. You can read the book online at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1.1/ or download it from http://www.linuxfroms