Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/23/07 19:01 CST:
>
>> What's a "program interpreter"?
>>
>> I'd prefer "default shell".
>
> Hopefully, Bruce is just joking. :-) I've been using the term since back
> in the days I was using a Tandy color computer with a 'basic' program
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/23/07 19:01 CST:
> What's a "program interpreter"?
>
> I'd prefer "default shell".
Hopefully, Bruce is just joking. :-) I've been using the term since back
in the days I was using a Tandy color computer with a 'basic' program
interpreter cartridge plugged in.
On 3/23/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm going ahead with this now with my preferred "default program
> > interpreter". Anyone can feel free to change this that doesn't work
> > for them.
>
> What's a "program interpreter"?
>
> I'd prefer "default shell".
When you set the she
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> "The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
>>> Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in
>>> case
>>> other shells (see BLFS) are i
On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> > How about:
> >
> > "The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
> > Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in
> > case
> > other shells (see BLFS) are installed and
> > linked
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:45, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > > How about:
> > >
> > > "The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
> > > Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash
> > >
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/14/07 11:26 CST:
> "Change its invocation (shebang) line to ...
Another suggestion: "Change its program interpreter (shebang) line to ..."
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.
On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> > How about:
> >
> > "The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
> > Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in
> > case
> > other shells (see BLFS) are installed and
> > linked
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> How about:
>
> "The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
> Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in case
> other shells (see BLFS) are installed and linked
> to /bin/sh later:"
I don't particularly like using the word 'sheba
On 3/14/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about:
>
> "The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax.
> Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in case
> other shells (see BLFS) are installed and linked
> to /bin/sh later:"
>
> Obviously the ma
On 3/13/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, at 09:49 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > Suggestions on the explanation welcomed for this patch.
> >
> As you miiight :) have noticed by now, I am not an expert in English language
> but ...
> shouldn't be ?
I was just testi
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 04:49, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > > So, I'm proposing that we force
> > > /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are:
> > >
> > > 1. Prior to config
On Tue, Mar 13, at 09:49 Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> Suggestions on the explanation welcomed for this patch.
>
As you miiight :) have noticed by now, I am not an expert in English language
but ...
shouldn't be ?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfroms
On 3/13/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> So, I'm proposing that we force
> /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are:
>
> 1. Prior to configure and changing dirs - sed -i 's|@BASH@|/bin/bash|'
> elf/ldd.in
I like t
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:44, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> So, I'm proposing that we force
> /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two possible ways are:
>
> 1. Prior to configure and changing dirs - sed -i 's|@BASH@|/bin/bash|'
> elf/ldd.in
I like this option too. It's easy to explain exactly what that c
On 3/12/07, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > I noticed that ldd is
> > a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh.
>
> And I briefly thought "well, could we patch ldd to make it POSIX?"
>
> Then I saw the script itself. Never mind. ;-)
Yeah, it's
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I noticed that ldd is
> a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh.
And I briefly thought "well, could we patch ldd to make it POSIX?"
Then I saw the script itself. Never mind. ;-)
> So, I'm proposing that we force
> /bin/bash as the shebang for ldd. Two p
Following along with the POSIXification of 2007, I noticed that ldd is
a bash script and will fail silently for non-bash /bin/sh.
[12:25 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] bash /usr/bin/ldd /lib/libc.so.6
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f2b000)
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f2a000)
[12:25 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED
18 matches
Mail list logo
