Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Since the only thing in LFS that requires pkg-config is E2fsprogs, the >> easiest thing would be to patch the E2fsprogs build mechanism to remove >> the dependency on pkg-config and then remove PCRE, Glib, and Pkg

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Since the only thing in LFS that requires pkg-config is E2fsprogs, the > easiest thing would be to patch the E2fsprogs build mechanism to remove > the dependency on pkg-config and then remove PCRE, Glib, and Pkg-config > and defer

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Ken Moffat
't, no doubt one or two other packages don't) is only concerned to see that we are using at least 0.16 (or, often, an earlier version, particularly 0.9.0, but I think I saw several 0.11). The package requiring 0.16 is glib-2.30.0 : I don't follow what changed in pkgconfig, but for the mome

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On 27/09/2011 22:35, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> With respect, Matt, it's the glib2 part that is bloat. I remember >> some discussion, but I forget why we did it > > pkg-config upstream, as of 0.26, removed the internal Glib-1 that it > used to bundle, therefore forcing us t

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Matthew Burgess
On 27/09/2011 22:35, Ken Moffat wrote: > With respect, Matt, it's the glib2 part that is bloat. I remember > some discussion, but I forget why we did it pkg-config upstream, as of 0.26, removed the internal Glib-1 that it used to bundle, therefore forcing us to install a system-wide copy and a

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:24:50PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream: > > Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is "Add Pkg-Config as it's > a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches." H

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Matthew Burgess
On 27/09/2011 20:24, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream: > > Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is "Add Pkg-Config as it's > a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches." However, that > ChangeLog

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Matthew Burgess
On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream: Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is "Add Pkg-Config as it's a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches." However, that ChangeLog entry is within a whole bunch of Util-Linux changes,

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:08:10PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote: > > > >> It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python. > > > > Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually t

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote: > >> It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python. > > Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually that bothered by those 2 > dependencies. libffi has no dependencies itself, and Python has no

Re: Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Matthew Burgess
On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote: > It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python. Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually that bothered by those 2 dependencies. libffi has no dependencies itself, and Python has no mandatory dependencies, so it's only 2 packages

Glib-2.30.0

2011-09-27 Thread Andrew Benton
Hello, It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page