Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-09-23 Thread Chung Pham The
I'm tired with LFS, but I still find a Linux system with good and fast. May build my own is best 2010/9/22 Dyllan > I came across this post and thought it should be noted, (somewhat > attempted by yourself Thibaud F.), along with what seems like many other > people out there struggling with the

Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-09-22 Thread Dyllan
I came across this post and thought it should be noted, (somewhat attempted by yourself Thibaud F.), along with what seems like many other people out there struggling with the building of GCC-4.x.x in chapter 6.1.6 of Linux from Scratch. If you run into the problem noted on this mailing list; ch

Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-06-22 Thread Thibaud Fabre
2010/6/21 Matthew Burgess > > I'm obviously doing something daft, as it's failing to build with those > options > for me. Here's my full configure command: > > ../gcc-4.5.0/configure \ > --target=$LFS_TGT --prefix=/tools \ > --disable-nls --disable-shared --disable-multilib \ >--disa

Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-06-21 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:02:15 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:34:55 -0600, Matthew Burgess > wrote: >> >>> What parameters, exactly, did you pass to get a successful build of GCC >>> with MPFR-3.0.0 in-tree? >> >> --with-gmp-include=/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc

Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-06-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:34:55 -0600, Matthew Burgess > wrote: > >> What parameters, exactly, did you pass to get a successful build of GCC >> with MPFR-3.0.0 in-tree? > > --with-gmp-include=/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gmp and > --with-gmp-lib=/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gm

Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-06-21 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:34:55 -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote: > What parameters, exactly, did you pass to get a successful build of GCC > with MPFR-3.0.0 in-tree? --with-gmp-include=/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gmp and --with-gmp-lib=/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gmp/.libs seem to do the trick so far.

Re: Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-06-21 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:50:03 +0200, Thibaud Fabre wrote: > I tried compiling using --with-gmp-include (as suggested as suggested by > V. Lefevre on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-06/msg00280.html), then with > --with-gmp, successfully with both options. I'm obviously doing something daft, as it

Fwd: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2

2010-06-20 Thread Thibaud Fabre
-- Forwarded message -- From: Thibaud Fabre Date: 2010/6/20 Subject: Re: [Info] LFS Temp System - GCC 4.5.0 with MPFR > 2.4.2 To: LFS Developers Mailinglist 2010/6/20 Matthew Burgess On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:07:19 +0200, Thibaud Fabre > wrote: > > GCC compilation will fail even