Dan Nicholson wrote:
If anyone would like to try --enable-default-toolkit=gtk2 (which is
the default) vs. --enable-default-toolkit=cairo-gtk2, I'd be
interested to hear a comparison. Unfortunately, I don't have the
hardware to throw down consecutive builds for FF. Whereas Randy said
the build t
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:15:16PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> >No, as the ones Mozilla uses may be old,
>
> If Mozilla are using old versions of these libraries perhaps they have
> a reason?
Yeah, and a very common reason is that zlib is not their code so it
doesn't get
Greg Schafer wrote:
> I never understood why the BLFS book chose to fly in the
> face of conventional upstream wisdom.
IIRC, when we first put mozilla (before firefox and thunderbird existed)
in the book, the build process was not quite the same. We also wanted
the process to be similar to the p
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 12/05/05 06:07 CST:
> What do these options do?
You already know the answer to this question. :-)
Do these have any effect?
Yes.
I can see no advantage to using them. If the mozilla code has been tested with
it's own versions of
these things doesn't it ma
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Lots of good stuff. I just want to quibble over some details.
ac_add_options --with-system-jpeg
ac_add_options --with-system-zlib
ac_add_options --with-system-png
What do these options do? Do these have any effect? I can see no advantage to
using them. If the mozilla cod
