On 2/22/06, Bob Winckelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My bad,
>
> I had seen
>
> >"[jhuntwork] - Adjust binutils-pass1 so we don't need to hang on to its
> >source directories..
>
> in the changelog... and I was under the (wrong) impression that those where no
> longer necessary. I missed the c
My bad,
I had seen
>"[jhuntwork] - Adjust binutils-pass1 so we don't need to hang on to its
>source directories..
in the changelog... and I was under the (wrong) impression that those where no
longer necessary. I missed the cp command, and thought that the commands no
longer mattered becaus
On 2/22/06, Bob Winckelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5.3. Binutils-2.16.1 - Pass 1
>
> At the bottom, the
>
> >Next, prepare the linker for the "Adjusting" phase later on:
> > make -C ld clean
> > make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib
> > cp -v ld/ld-new /tools/bin
>
> is no longer necessary I believe
# Adjusting the Toolchain
# Tcl-8.4.12
# Expect-5.43.0
# DejaGNU-1.4.4
# GCC-4.0.2 - Pass 2
# Binutils-2.16.1 - Pass 2
Between toolchain adjustment and the 2nd pass of binutils, there are
five packages including binutils itself get complied. If the ld were not
replaced, it would search librari
Bob Winckelmans wrote:
5.3. Binutils-2.16.1 - Pass 1
At the bottom, the
Next, prepare the linker for the “Adjusting” phase later on:
make -C ld clean
make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib
cp -v ld/ld-new /tools/bin
is no longer necessary I believe,
Kind regards,
Bob
Huh? Why is it "not necessary
5.3. Binutils-2.16.1 - Pass 1
At the bottom, the
>Next, prepare the linker for the “Adjusting” phase later on:
> make -C ld clean
> make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib
> cp -v ld/ld-new /tools/bin
is no longer necessary I believe,
Kind regards,
Bob
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
