Randy McMurchy wrote:
The only bash docs installed right now are in man and info format. These
files are difficult to print, as well as being difficult to search
through.
Printing the manual page is easy:
man -t bash >bash.ps
lpr bash.ps
This gives 64 letter pages or 60 A4 pages
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:54:30PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> Well, bashref.html is linked to from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~matthew/LFS-references.html, which is
> itself linked to from chapter01/resources.html in the book. We could
> add a link to the full bash-doc tarball to
r03/packages.xml (revision 6604)
+++ chapter03/packages.xml (working copy)
@@ -33,6 +33,13 @@
+Bash Docs (&bash-doc-version;) - 1,994 KB:
+
+
+
+
+
+
Binutils (&binutils-version;) - 12,272 KB:
I
Randy McMurchy wrote:
BZ it, or just send you a patch to trunk?
I have the patch ready. :-)
Well, I'm all for conserving BZ numbers :) Sure, the patch would be
great! Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: Se
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 07/30/05 14:43 CST:
> M.Canales.es wrote:
>
>>The precedent is already here. We are dowloading the glibc-linuxthreads
>>package only to install the API manpages.
>
> Damn this all too knowledgable community! Thanks Manuel. Randy, care
> to bugzilla this?
M.Canales.es wrote:
The precedent is already here. We are dowloading the glibc-linuxthreads
package only to install the API manpages.
Damn this all too knowledgable community! Thanks Manuel. Randy, care
to bugzilla this?
Cheers,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-
El Sábado, 30 de Julio de 2005 20:54, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Well, bashref.html is linked to from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~matthew/LFS-references.html, which is
> itself linked to from chapter01/resources.html in the book. We could
> add a link to the full bash-doc tarball to the L
-3.0 Docs tarball that can be downloaded which has
> > lots of additional Bash docs in many formats. This tarball is rather
> > large (1.9 MB), and because if this the following may not be suitable
> > for LFS.
>
> Well, bashref.html is linked to from
> http://www.linuxf
l to the LFS-references.html page
> I suppose. I'm wary of putting instructions in the book itself for fear
> of setting a precedent :-)
A valid point. However, seems giving folks the option to install
the HTML versions of the BASH docs could only be a good thing.
If there are other p
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to make folks aware of something, and let this be discussed
and see if perhaps some action should be taken.
There is a Bash-3.0 Docs tarball that can be downloaded which has
lots of additional Bash docs in many formats. This tarball is rather
large
> Seeing how the Bash documentation is expansive, it may be nice to have
> the HTML files installed, allowing folks to easily print and have
> browser search capability.
>
> What say the group?
I think it should be included for sure... :) If you're going to be doing
LFS, it probably means you'l
Hi all,
I'd like to make folks aware of something, and let this be discussed
and see if perhaps some action should be taken.
There is a Bash-3.0 Docs tarball that can be downloaded which has
lots of additional Bash docs in many formats. This tarball is rather
large (1.9 MB), and because if
12 matches
Mail list logo
