- Original Message -
From: "Rob Landley"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Cc: "Bruce Dubbs"
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: 6.8 patch tweaks.
...
>
> Ok, bug in busybox I should fix. Still, the patch doesn't need two
&g
On 07/08/2011 11:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> 2) rm "$SRCDIR"/procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch || exit 1
>
>> The path has a "//" which means -p1 winds up with an absolute path after
>> discarding one "/".
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here with the 'rm ... |exit 1', but the patch
> applies c
Rob Landley wrote:
> I'm automating LFS 6.8, and two of the patches don't apply with busybox
> patch:
>
> 1) gcc-4.5.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
>
> Requires "fuzz" support, which I didn't implement because it tends to
> mis-apply patches. (This is not the same as applying at an offset, this
> is d
I'm automating LFS 6.8, and two of the patches don't apply with busybox
patch:
1) gcc-4.5.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
Requires "fuzz" support, which I didn't implement because it tends to
mis-apply patches. (This is not the same as applying at an offset, this
is discarding context lines in order to
