Re: Binutils pass2, --disable-nls

2008-10-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Robert Connolly wrote: > Is there a reason Binutils pass2 has --disable-nls? Yes, the same as before: if someone wishes to use HJL binutils, this avoids the "gettext" host requirement. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-

Binutils pass2, --disable-nls

2008-10-25 Thread Robert Connolly
Is there a reason Binutils pass2 has --disable-nls? robert pgpPjHt55KEs0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: --disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Greg Schafer
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Greg Schafer wrote: >> Hmmm, interesting. Is this a FSF or HJL thing or both? I've just noticed >> that Binutils-pass2 also has --disable-nls. Hmm, OK. That is certainly >> good reason to pass '--disable-nls'. > > Thi

Re: --disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
st noticed that Binutils-pass2 also has --disable-nls. Hmm, OK. That is certainly good reason to pass '--disable-nls'. This is at least for HJL. Not tested with FSF. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/

Re: --disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Greg Schafer
s-pass2 also has --disable-nls. Hmm, OK. That is certainly good reason to pass '--disable-nls'. The original point remains. The explanation needs clarification. > How about: > > "This avoids dependency on gettext being installed on the host. Since we > set LC_ALL=POSIX du

Re: --disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Greg Schafer
I described. If it's to stay it should at least be clarified. ie: enhanced to explain why only the pass1's of Binutils and GCC are given `--disable-nls'. >> It's a hangover from the days when the Pass1's of Binutils and GCC were >> statically linked. (NLS was k

Re: --disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Greg Schafer wrote: Hi The explanation in Ch 5 Binutils Pass1 for --disable-nls says: "This disables internationalization as i18n is not needed for the temporary tools." This is misleading because only the Pass1's of Binutils and GCC are passed `--disable-nls'. For

Re: --disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Archaic
ation on some hosts when > linking statically). No it was found that glibc would require gettext if binutils was built with nls. (Of course, that is if my memory isn't too fuzzy.) > 3) pass --disable-nls to every pkg in Ch 5 that can handle it. Not needed, but I personally would suppor

--disable-nls

2005-08-23 Thread Greg Schafer
Hi The explanation in Ch 5 Binutils Pass1 for --disable-nls says: "This disables internationalization as i18n is not needed for the temporary tools." This is misleading because only the Pass1's of Binutils and GCC are passed `--disable-nls'. For the statement to be accu