Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 14:58 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I thought we dropped module-init-tools in favor of kmod. However there
>> are several places that still mention module-init-tools:
>> dependencies.xml, whatsnew.xml (commented out), patches.xml,
>> packages.xml,
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 14:58 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I thought we dropped module-init-tools in favor of kmod. However there
> are several places that still mention module-init-tools:
> dependencies.xml, whatsnew.xml (commented out), patches.xml,
> packages.xml, chapter06.xml (commented out
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>> From: "Tobias Gasser"
>>> zlib 1.2.6 seems to have some issues.
>>>
>>> building partimage 0.6.9 fails with several errors in imagefile.cpp
>>>
> I send one mail to Mark Adler and the answer is :
> "Upon examination, I see that both module-init-tools-3.16 and partimag
- Original Message -
From: "Gilles Espinasse"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] zlib 1.2.6 incompatibilities
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tobias Gasser"
> To:
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Gasser"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:27 AM
Subject: [lfs-dev] zlib 1.2.6 incompatibilities
>
> zlib 1.2.6 seems to have some issues.
>
> building partimage 0.6.9 fails with several errors in imagefile.cpp
>
> er
zlib 1.2.6 seems to have some issues.
building partimage 0.6.9 fails with several errors in imagefile.cpp
error cannot convert 'gzFile_s**' to 'gzFile' for argument...
using zlib 1.2.5 fixes this error.
google was no help, possibly i'm the first to hit this issue as zlib
1.2.6 was released jus
