Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:00:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when
>> transitioning to udev from systemd-211.
>>
>> 83-cdrom-symlinks.rules needs write_cd_rules, so those go together.
>>
> Taking a quick look
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:00:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when
> transitioning to udev from systemd-211.
>
> 83-cdrom-symlinks.rules needs write_cd_rules, so those go together.
>
Taking a quick look at them, I admit I don't
Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> On 2014-04-02 20:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when
>> transitioning to udev from systemd-211.
>>
>> What we have is
>> 55-lfs.rules,
>> 81-cdrom.rules,
>> 83-cdrom-symlinks.rules,
>> write_cd_rules,
>> write_net_
On 2014-04-02 20:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when
> transitioning to udev from systemd-211.
>
> What we have is
> 55-lfs.rules,
> 81-cdrom.rules,
> 83-cdrom-symlinks.rules,
> write_cd_rules,
> write_net_rules, and
> init-net-rules.sh
>
I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when
transitioning to udev from systemd-211.
What we have is
55-lfs.rules,
81-cdrom.rules,
83-cdrom-symlinks.rules,
write_cd_rules,
write_net_rules, and
init-net-rules.sh
I do think we need init-net-rules.sh and write_net_rules t
