On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:02:24 +0100, Pierre Labastie
wrote:
> Should be corrected in current upstream patch list. Do not know
> if you LFS devs think it is a big issue (having math.h needlessly
> included when ncurses C++ bindings are used). I suggest
> waiting for the next release of ncurses.
Y
Le 21/02/2012 21:51, Andrew Benton a écrit :
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0100
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the
>> already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing
>> somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0100
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the
> already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing
> somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else
> does ICA, there is this difference in
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0100
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the
> already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing
> somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else
> does ICA, there is this difference in
Hi,
I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the
already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing
somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else
does ICA, there is this difference in etip.h between ICA
iterations 1 and 2:
