Re: [lfs-dev] procps-ng kill vs util-linux kill

2013-01-21 Thread William Harrington
On Jan 21, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Is there really a preference? I don't know about preference, but I ran across this over the summer when encountering a similar question elsewhere: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-July/023320.html Sincerely, Wil

Re: [lfs-dev] procps-ng kill vs util-linux kill

2013-01-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 15:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> See ticket #3095. >> >> I'm starting to write the instructions for updating procps to procps-ng. >>Right now we remove the kill command from procps because it is >> installed in util-linux. Is there really a prefere

Re: [lfs-dev] procps-ng kill vs util-linux kill

2013-01-21 Thread Matt Burgess
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 15:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > See ticket #3095. > > I'm starting to write the instructions for updating procps to procps-ng. > Right now we remove the kill command from procps because it is > installed in util-linux. Is there really a preference? Arguments I can com

[lfs-dev] procps-ng kill vs util-linux kill

2013-01-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
See ticket #3095. I'm starting to write the instructions for updating procps to procps-ng. Right now we remove the kill command from procps because it is installed in util-linux. Is there really a preference? procps-ng is installed after util-linux, so if it's built in both places, the vers