Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 27/03/2013 19:47, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> >>> It really looks like it is a tcl error (I cannot think of a reason why >>> gcc would try to compire a *regular* expression). I found this bug report: >>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 27/03/2013 19:47, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >> It really looks like it is a tcl error (I cannot think of a reason why >> gcc would try to compire a *regular* expression). I found this bug report: >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3603557&group_id=10894&at

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 27/03/2013 01:15, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >>> The tests in chapter 6 are very clean (no errors in glibc except the >>> ignored ones), only one in gcc libmudflap. >> Yes, I only got: >> >> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (3 optimization var

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 27/03/2013 01:15, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> The tests in chapter 6 are very clean (no errors in glibc except the >> ignored ones), only one in gcc libmudflap. > Yes, I only got: > > FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (3 optimization variations) > > Running > /sources/

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > The tests in chapter 6 are very clean (no errors in glibc except the > ignored ones), only one in gcc libmudflap. Yes, I only got: FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (3 optimization variations) Running /sources/gcc-4.8.0/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.cth/cthfrags.e

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > gcc 4.8.0 release has been out for a couple of days. I have built > current lfs with it, using the method 2) described in my message of > January 10. The nice thing is that now libstdc++ can be built > standalone, so that you do not need to keep the gcc build tree a

[lfs-dev] gcc 4.8.0

2013-03-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, gcc 4.8.0 release has been out for a couple of days. I have built current lfs with it, using the method 2) described in my message of January 10. The nice thing is that now libstdc++ can be built standalone, so that you do not need to keep the gcc build tree around. Let me recall how it