Re: [lfs-dev] The jh branch has been merged

2012-04-29 Thread James Robertson
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > James Robertson wrote: > > This is awesome news Bruce. > > > > This is a major accomplishment if you ask me. Good work by all in > > incorporating a big change to the toolchain build. My thinking is we > might > > want to consider a new majo

Re: [lfs-dev] The jh branch has been merged

2012-04-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
James Robertson wrote: > This is awesome news Bruce. > > This is a major accomplishment if you ask me. Good work by all in > incorporating a big change to the toolchain build. My thinking is we might > want to consider a new major version to the book. The major thanks need to go to JH. However

Re: [lfs-dev] The jh branch has been merged

2012-04-25 Thread James Robertson
This is awesome news Bruce. This is a major accomplishment if you ask me. Good work by all in incorporating a big change to the toolchain build. My thinking is we might want to consider a new major version to the book. James On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I've just mer

[lfs-dev] The jh branch has been merged

2012-04-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I've just merged the jh branch into trunk. I had a little problem with the svn merge command so I baically did it manually. Please pay close attention to any new builds and give tell us any issues you see with instructions, text, or the xml. I have also updated the web site version of the boo