On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:29 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Running the same program as root fails.
>
> sudo make check TESTS=test-getlogin
>
> The program is doing:
>
> buf = getlogin();
> name = getenv( "USERNAME" );
>
> And failing if they don't match. In my case,
>
> name=root
> buf=bdubbs
>
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I had a thought last week that this omission of the setuid bit is what's
> causing the test
> failures in the gnulib tests included in the latest version of coreutils.
> I'll see if I
> can find time this week to test that theory out.
The only test that fails is test-g
Le 24/04/2012 11:00, Matthew Burgess a écrit :
>
> 1) sudo chmod a=rx,u+s /tools/bin/su in chapter 5 coreutils
> 2) Dropped the getlogin.c sed from chapter 6 coreutils
>
> The test still fails. It appears to be because of the way that jhalfs is
> setting things
> up. The test assumes you will ha
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:01:33 -0600, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:48:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
> wrote:
>
>> I'm in the middle of a jh build right now. Just finishing up Chapter 5.
>> I'll take a look when it completes. The toolchain built without
> complaint.
>
> Thanks. Note
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:48:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm in the middle of a jh build right now. Just finishing up Chapter 5.
> I'll take a look when it completes. The toolchain built without complaint.
Thanks. Note that the sed added in r9799 masks the test failures so you may
want to re
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:23:58 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
> wrote:
>> On 4/23/12 1:11 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> The reason is that /tools/bin/su cannot work for a normal user,
>>> because the setuid bit cannot be set at install in chapter 5 (if
>>> installing as user lfs).
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:23:58 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
wrote:
> On 4/23/12 1:11 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> The reason is that /tools/bin/su cannot work for a normal user,
>> because the setuid bit cannot be set at install in chapter 5 (if
>> installing as user lfs). Hence the choice of naming it
On 4/23/12 1:11 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> The reason is that /tools/bin/su cannot work for a normal user,
> because the setuid bit cannot be set at install in chapter 5 (if
> installing as user lfs). Hence the choice of naming it su-tools, to
> prevent it to run (and fail) if the lfs user (who h
Le 23/04/2012 18:45, Jeremy Huntwork a écrit :
> This changelog entry on 2012-04-05 isn't quite correct. It reads:
>
> [matthew] - Use su from chapter 6 Coreutils in the Bash instructions,
> instead of the one from chapter 5. Install su as su rather than su-tools
> in chapter 5. Fixes #3057.
>
> co
On 4/23/12 12:45 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> This changelog entry on 2012-04-05 isn't quite correct. It reads:
>
> [matthew] - Use su from chapter 6 Coreutils in the Bash instructions,
> instead of the one from chapter 5. Install su as su rather than su-tools
> in chapter 5. Fixes #3057.
>
> coreu
This changelog entry on 2012-04-05 isn't quite correct. It reads:
[matthew] - Use su from chapter 6 Coreutils in the Bash instructions,
instead of the one from chapter 5. Install su as su rather than su-tools
in chapter 5. Fixes #3057.
coreutils in chapter 6 doesn't install su. So the su you're
11 matches
Mail list logo
