Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 16:18 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll look at that when I finish with the LFS portion. I'm learning
>> quite a bit about the new and wonderful world of Makefiles. :)
>
> New? Wonderful? Bruce, I think you've been hammering BLFS too hard just
> re
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 16:18 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> OK, I'll look at that when I finish with the LFS portion. I'm learning
> quite a bit about the new and wonderful world of Makefiles. :)
New? Wonderful? Bruce, I think you've been hammering BLFS too hard just
recently and need to take a bre
Armin K. wrote:
> On 07/13/2012 10:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
>>
>> Are you going to get glibc today?
>>
>> I've been working on udev/systemd. I can build everything and am
>> working on the install. I'll package things out and post the changes
>> here. It's pretty
On 07/13/2012 10:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
>
> Are you going to get glibc today?
>
> I've been working on udev/systemd. I can build everything and am
> working on the install. I'll package things out and post the changes
> here. It's pretty involved so I'd like to g
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 15:24 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
>
> Are you going to get glibc today?
No. I've got a work in progress patch, which handles all of Andy's
observations prior to the chapter 5 diffutils breakage. At that point I
tried to figure out why the gets()
Lots of work Matt. Thanks.
Are you going to get glibc today?
I've been working on udev/systemd. I can build everything and am
working on the install. I'll package things out and post the changes
here. It's pretty involved so I'd like to get others to test before
committing changes. Hopefu
