Re: [lfs-dev] Latest tests

2014-02-15 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Gregory H. Nietsky wrote: > > On 02/15/14 10:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> These automake tests pass if the static library is present and the .so >> files are missing. `nm libfl.so.2.0.0` gives: >> >> U yylex >> >> U means undefined. The linker crashes on that. I'll revert the change >> to flex

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest tests

2014-02-15 Thread Gregory H. Nietsky
On 02/15/14 10:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > These automake tests pass if the static library is present and the .so > files are missing. `nm libfl.so.2.0.0` gives: > > U yylex > > U means undefined. The linker crashes on that. I'll revert the change > to flex that creates the dynamic libraries.

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest tests

2014-02-15 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I just finished a full build with the latest svn and got five test errors: > > 073-glibc-2.19: [/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-ftell-partial-wide.out] > 073-glibc-2.19: [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-robust8.out] > > 104-automake-1.14.1:FAIL: t/lex-depend-cxx.sh > 104-automake-

[lfs-dev] Latest tests

2014-02-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I just finished a full build with the latest svn and got five test errors: 073-glibc-2.19: [/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-ftell-partial-wide.out] 073-glibc-2.19: [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-robust8.out] 104-automake-1.14.1:FAIL: t/lex-depend-cxx.sh 104-automake-1.14.1:FAIL: t/lex-clean-cxx.sh