On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I think most systems are used by a single user. There are exceptions,
> of course, but a Ubuntu or Gentoo or Debian system is generally used by
> one user. Does this feature really provide a benefit to the single user
> system?
>
> Servers tha
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to know: where is it better to propose hints? It seems this here
> was uploaded (great!), whereas this I suggested on hints mailing list is
> not and without any comment. Did I misunderstand some steps?
We don't have as many developers as we used to have
Hi,
Just to know: where is it better to propose hints? It seems this here
was uploaded (great!), whereas this I suggested on hints mailing list is
not and without any comment. Did I misunderstand some steps?
Thanks,
Best regards,
-
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Président de l'associatio
Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2012 12:28:31 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Interesting. Other than allowing systemd to run, what benefits does
>> using cgroups give?
>
>>From Wikipedia:
> cgroups (control groups) is a Linux kernel feature to limit, account and
> isolate resource usage (CPU,
On Monday 08 October 2012 12:28:31 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Interesting. Other than allowing systemd to run, what benefits does
> using cgroups give?
>From Wikipedia:
cgroups (control groups) is a Linux kernel feature to limit, account and
isolate resource usage (CPU, memory, disk I/O, etc.) of proc
Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2012 10:51:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Did you ever run 'mount' from the command line?
>
> I configured the kernel without any of the cgroup controllers and now only one
> cgroup (the systemd cgroup) shows up when issuing the mount command.
>
> My kernel c
On Tuesday 02 October 2012 10:51:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Did you ever run 'mount' from the command line?
I configured the kernel without any of the cgroup controllers and now only one
cgroup (the systemd cgroup) shows up when issuing the mount command.
My kernel config:
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
# CONFIG
Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes:
> Chris W. wrote:
> > Systemd
> > has matured quite a bit since last year and more distributions are
> > using it, among them Arch Linux.
>
> OTOH, Gentoo is creating a udev fork.
I agree, that it should not be necessary to install all of systemd just
to use udev.
> From: Bruce Dubbs
>>> Do you have any data? How fast can you get from grub to the login
>> LFS 7.2 from grub to login prompt and back with 2.4 Ghz (dual)
>> Core i5 on the notebook running in Parallels 8, no SSD:
>>
>> SysVinit: 15 sec. bootup, 14 sec. shutdown
>> Systemd : 4.5 sec
wagnerlia-li...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> Bootup and shutdown times are considerably faster than
>>> with SysVinit.
>>
>> Do you have any data? How fast can you get from grub to the login
>> prompt using systemd? sysvinit? What hardware are you using?
>
> LFS 7.2 from grub to login prompt and back w
Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes:
> Slightly reformatted, it would be very nice as a hint.
Thanks Bruce for your encouraging comments and for uploading the hint.
> Chris W. wrote:
> > Systemd
> > has matured quite a bit since last year and more distributions are
> > using it, among them Arch Li
Matthew Burgess linuxfromscratch.org> writes:
> That's a really well written document! I think it should be submitted
> as a hint
> prior to any potential inclusion in BLFS (I'm not confident it will
> ever make it
> into LFS due to its dependencies, but you never know!).
>
Thanks Matt for y
Chris W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
> finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
> good basis for this. My goal was to eventually replace SysVinit
> completely with systemd. I fully expected lots of things
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:14:26 + (UTC), Chris W.
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
> finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
> good basis for this.
>
> I hope you'll find this guide helpful and would we
Hello,
I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
good basis for this. My goal was to eventually replace SysVinit
completely with systemd. I fully expected lots of things to break, but
was pleasantl
15 matches
Mail list logo
