On Aug 31, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
There is already a thread about this which I recall from August:
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/lfs-dev@linuxfromscrat
Am 31.08.2012 19:35, schrieb Nathan Coulson:
>> i'll write about the results as soon as the build is done.
i now have (almost) finished my system.
xfce is up with firefox and thunderbird. only libreoffice and vlc are
missing - but that's another story ;)
everything is fine, no errors occurred
Tobias Gasser schrieb:
>
> until now i used --strip-all on binaries. a little googling convinced me
> to change my script as --strip-unneeded seems to to have intelligence ;)
>
there is NO difference in size!
at least not with what i've built so far.
now i'll go ahead to build x and stay with -
Nathan Coulson schrieb:
> Back when that text was added to the book, --strip-all removed
> something from the static libraries that is needed to link to them
> (basically making them useless). Symbol table perhaps?
i don't strip any static libs.
see my script:
file xx.a | grep ELF
will be empt
On Aug 31, 2012, at 02:34 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
> libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
>
> I found this page:
> http://www.technovelty.org/linux/
>
> Which states that --strip-unneeded is safe to use on both shared
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Baho Utot schrieb:
>>
>> #-- Options to be used when stripping binaries. See `man strip' for details.
>> STRIP_BINARIES="--strip-all"
>> #-- Options to be used when stripping shared libraries. See `man strip'
>> for details.
>> STRIP_SHARED=
Baho Utot schrieb:
>
> #-- Options to be used when stripping binaries. See `man strip' for details.
> STRIP_BINARIES="--strip-all"
> #-- Options to be used when stripping shared libraries. See `man strip'
> for details.
> STRIP_SHARED="--strip-unneeded"
> #-- Options to be used when stripping sta
On 08/31/2012 03:34 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
> libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
>
> I found this page:
> http://www.technovelty.org/linux/
>
> Which states that --strip-unneeded is safe to use on both shared and
> st
On 31.8.2012 9:34, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
> libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
>
> I found this page:
> http://www.technovelty.org/linux/
>
> Which states that --strip-unneeded is safe to use on both shared and
> static
Ragnar Thomsen schrieb:
> It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
> libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
>
> I found this page:
> http://www.technovelty.org/linux/
>
> Which states that --strip-unneeded is safe to use on both shared and
> static libraries, whil
Hello,
I read the same page several months ago.
So I checked on a testing system : I stripped existing binaries and shared
libraries with "--strip-all", and static libraries with "--strip-unneeded".
The system remained fully functional, and subsequent linking operations
were all successful. So, t
It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
I found this page:
http://www.technovelty.org/linux/
Which states that --strip-unneeded is safe to use on both shared and
static libraries, while --strip-all is only safe for shared on
12 matches
Mail list logo
