Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:06:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>The great benefit of git is in branches - in svn, a branch is "cast
>>> in stone" and is a PITA. In git, branches are just pointers. If
>>> you want to maintain a stable branch, you can ch
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:06:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > The great benefit of git is in branches - in svn, a branch is "cast
> > in stone" and is a PITA. In git, branches are just pointers. If
> > you want to maintain a stable branch, you can cherry-pick specific
> >
On Mar 9, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> The big benefit of svn is increasing decimal revision numbers.
I saw a while back this for a pre-commit hook.
What you could end up with is a pre-commit hook which would include in
the comment a revision number, with an algo not involving looki
Ken Moffat wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Ken Moffat -
>
> #?^€^ ! I managed to send the reply to blfs instead of lfs.
>
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 09:16:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> Merging is generally not needed by me, but that may be the reason Armin
>> wants to move to gi
- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat -
#?^€^ ! I managed to send the reply to blfs instead of lfs.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 09:16:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Merging is generally not needed by me, but that may be the reason Armin
> wants to move to git. I can't remember the las
