On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:39:03PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Ken you do know that if both libpackage.so and libpackage.a exist and
> the link line has -lpackage, the loader always selects the .so version,
> right? The developer has to go out of the way to do static links in
> that case.
>
--- Em seg, 9/1/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Security LFS7.0
> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> Data: Segunda-feira, 9 de Janeiro de 2012, 19:06
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux VMWLFS70 3.2.0 #1 S
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:35:56AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> I would like to know if the choice "--enable-shared --disable-static" is
> safe, and what are the consequences of "--disable-nis".
>
Noting your $subject, you do realise that in blfs you are
responsible for your own secur
