Re: [blfs-dev] Packages which could be removed.

2012-03-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > I only removed packages that I knew weren't coming back and I don't > think any of them were edited less than a year ago. The packages I've > removed from the book today are just commented out to make it easier to > revert if needed. Exactly the right approach IMO. -- B

Re: [blfs-dev] Packages which could be removed.

2012-03-05 Thread Andrew Benton
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:33:46 -0600 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > Until you physically removed some > > things this weekend, my impression was that the xml for old packages > > always remained in the book, but the packages were commented in > > general.ent and in whichever xml file