On Nov 6, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Rob Thornton wrote:
>
> I think wget should be included as a part of LFS, if only as an
> option,
> or warning, linking to it's BLFS chapter. It should be noted too
> that it
> will need to be reinstalled once its optional dependencies become
> available during the
On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> Just a note to say that I built and booted it today. No issues. I
>> even ran almost all the tests. I added Device-mapper+LVM2 and
>> replaced
>> SysVinit with runit as is my wont, so this doesn't test the
>> bootscri
On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Roebe XXX wrote:
> I do sometimes feel as if the LFS project seems to hibernate for a
> really long time, with hardly any changes whatsoever.
>
> I also admit freely that I find the LFS process is too slow.
>
> Maybe I am too impatient as well but I think the process
On Aug 6, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Who are you? Comments like those in the last couple of posts are not
> appreciated. I don't know if you are trying to be funny or not, but
> the result
> is not.
>
> -- Bruce
Oops,
Sent to the wrong list. I
Go find a new life to live with! The next time you seem serious BLFS
I'd hope you'd be serious. The rest of us don't find it very funny.
-William
On Aug 6, 2008, at 5:32 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>> By default, version > 9.4
> Oops..obviously that should have been a < (less than).
On Aug 6, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> At least on iana-etc-2.30, there is a STRIP option that remove all
> comments.
>
> Time to resolve protocol name lineary depend of /etc/services file
> size
>
> See
> http://www.diy-linux.org/pipermail/diy-linux-dev/2006-January/000719.htm
Hello,
Pre-requisites are definitely explained in the appropriate
section of the book, and this might be provided in the prerequisites;
http://freshmeat.net/projects/rute/
If that isn't working properly than the Wayback machine can help:
http://web.archive.org/web/20040601065254/www.ic
On Oct 13, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On 10/12/07, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Let me put that another way: the chances that I get any interest in
>> having one are slim :) But it's nice to know than one can be had
>> cheaply.
>>
> Lets
