On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Merry Christmas to you all. I hope it is a good one for everybody. Easy on
the spiced egg nogg ;)
Sip... don't gulp. Gulping would be rough.
Merry Christmas!
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I want to add my opinion to this issue. After reading many posts about
the alphabetizing of the packages, I still do not see any practical
value. I'm not really opposed either. I just feel its more effort than
its worth.
In the absence of any dependen
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
If anyone wants any other features included now's the time to get those
requests in.
Funny how powerful one little sentence can be. :)
And no kidding.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, sash wrote:
gullible? or kind, understanding and compassionate?
You always put such a nice spin on things, sash. :)
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Its buried fairly deeply in the autoconf documentation. Its always
useful to point out these types of things. That's really one of the
primary purposes of the whole project.
You do speak the truth. I don't remember how I came across config.site
but I
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
The CLFS Project.
Cross Linux From Scratch is a book dedicated to building on various
architectures. Currently we have Alpha, Sparc, PowerPC, x86, and x86_64
architectures in the book.
Cross LFS will teach you how to build a cross architecture toolcha
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the
user about config.site, and the book already sets other variables at
Doesn't anyone read the documentation anymore? :) I can understand
needing to teach them about configure...
Ste
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote:
The only thing I can think of is this is how it was many, many
moons ago, and the devs simply haven't updated their defaults to
conform with modern standards.
That's actually pretty good. :)))
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Because the current way has symlinks /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc.
It would be nice to get rid of these depending on how picky you are.
Why don't we just have a regular /usr/man directory? Why get rid of them
at all? What's the rationale behind t
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Yes, in the current "normal" LFS, this config.site file can be really used
for --prefix=/usr only. But let's move forward. There's no /usr/info,
/usr/doc and /usr/man compatibility symlinks in FHS 2.3, and LFS still has
I thought that I had FH
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Archaic wrote:
the need to do things manually. Repetition is good for learning while
building LFS.
I second this.
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello people,
I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it passed
all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the tests. For
Party at Andrew's house!
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
leave. And I had expected one of the server admins to delete my account on
belg... but that never happened... :)
The server knows the future.
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Guess that's what I get by trying to follow a thread through the news server.
Have you tried "get all new messages"? *ducks*
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: Se
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Is it time to remove the obsolete note about unsetting CFLAGS and
CXXFLAGS from the glibc instructions?
As a user I feel that every package should build correctly with envvars as
thin as possible. I'm jealous about my envvars.
BTW, Greg S. has t
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Richard A Downing wrote:
ppps Follow ups to /dev/null please. (That is if udev/hotplug will give
it the right damn permissions today!)
I'm not the only one having that problem?
s I don't have a shrink really, I'm as sane as you are ;-)
How do you know you're alive?
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
I think the person who wrote the email needs to grow up and get a life.
So much hostility... :)
I've found that the best way to deal with things like that is, if at all
possible, to refuse to acknowledge that they exist. Never throw good
posts after b
Everyone has something which takes a large part of their life and
occasionally hedges out other important things. If it's going to be LFS
it's not such a bad way to go. The trick is to not get too stressed out
when you notice other things falling behind.
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch
18 matches
Mail list logo
