Re: Possible future hint: full package users build notes. . .

2010-10-21 Thread max
Hi, I will also rebuild LFS 6.6 on a real computer and thus verify the notes. I will give you some feedback in a couple of days. -- Regards Max -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS-build-notes

2010-10-12 Thread max
bably) not have any impact on the performance of the system later. Of course, a clean solution is still better than a workaround. Matter of priniple. -- Regards Max -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS-build-notes

2010-10-11 Thread max
need to set it suid root if you want normal users to be able to use mount. No problems expected during boot. Did you recompile and install glibc and gcc as package user? Just curious. -- Regards Max -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/

Re: LFS-build-notes

2010-10-10 Thread max
ld be okay. Sure, no problem. -- Regards Max -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS-build-notes

2010-10-09 Thread max
reason for that might be creating the partitions with parted. It seems, that parted causes some issues with cylinder boundaries. So this error is probably _not_ related to the package management technique. Maybe the book should advice against using parted for LFS. But I am not sure about that yet. -- Regards Max -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS-build-notes

2010-10-08 Thread max
Changing ownership of the target is not required. -- Regards Max -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

chapter 6.52: psmisc-22.10

2010-09-13 Thread max . mann
alling LFS, I think the book should completely discard the alternative of keeping killall. Best Regards Max ___ WEB.DE DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99 €/mtl.!* http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL-Doppel-Flatrate/2 --

[no subject]

2010-09-13 Thread max . mann
 Hello LFS maintainers,while I was building LFS 6.6 I discovered a problem in chapter 6.52: psmisc-22.10.According to the book the optional command   ln -sv killall /bin/pidofcan be issued at the end of the chapter. However, killall was installed in the directory  /usr/bin/killallSo executing this