On May 18, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/18/12 3:36 PM, Qrux wrote:
>> I'll let you and Bruce continue on about experimentation, etc. I would
>> ordinarily chime in (and suggest probably more flame-worthy stuff like
>> moving to git would foster more experimentation, because th
On Feb 23, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read several times that some of you were using DESTDIR
> and recording the installed files for being able to uninstall
> packages. I recently realized that what I have called `package
> management' in jhalfs could be used for t
On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>
>> cd ${PROGNAME}-$LFSVRS; bash process-scripts.sh >> $LOGDIR/$LOG 2>&1 ; cd ..
>
> May I suggest: pushd ${PROGNAME}-$LFSVRS; ...; popd
>
> It's a little more robust.
Yes, your r
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Pierre Labastie
wrote:
> Le 17/02/2012 18:30, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>
>>> I had a quick look at the Makefile and make-aux-files.sh script and couldn't
>>> see why that line is required. Bruce, is there a reason those .script
>>> files a
On 1/26/2012 12:32 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA
>> lately.
> I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it.
>
>> ICA is broken becaus
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>> From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
>> inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount
>> of the host&
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Julio Meca Hansen wrote:
> I've lost the background on this. Looking at util-linux, why do we need
> it at all in Chapter 5? Can't we just build it once in Chapter 6 just
> before the first file that needs it?
>
From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /d
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Julio Meca Hansen wrote:
> I've lost the background on this. Looking at util-linux, why do we need
> it at all in Chapter 5? Can't we just build it once in Chapter 6 just
> before the first file that needs it?
>
From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /d
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Julio Meca Hansen wrote:
> I've lost the background on this. Looking at util-linux, why do we need
> it at all in Chapter 5? Can't we just build it once in Chapter 6 just
> before the first file that needs it?
>
From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /d
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
On Sun, May 28, at 07:04:20 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
perhaps a new book with any relative info that has to do with:
a.'Handling Devices' (udev)
b.'Boot process' (init schemes,bootscripts,bootmanager,etc)
c.'Automounting Devices'
d.'Volumes,raid
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
For example:
"a) I liked the field in BZ that was available for a relevant URL."
You liked it. Great. Wonderful. So what? Now in Trac you can include a
link *anywhere* and it is dynamic. Especially when you include them in
your opening remarks is it powerful. No major
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
To all Project Leads:
As was mentioned in a thread on the lfs-dev list, the server admins
would like to upgrade the version of Subversion on Belgarath. Being that
it's not a minor version upgrade, it is recommended by upstream devs to
dump and re-load the repositories.
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Note that if the community prefers items 2 or 3, I would still like to
use the new logo on our exisiting sites, so comments on that are welcome
as well.
I very much like the way you can view the subversion tree, and the
bugzilla bugs now converted to tickets are much
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2.6.11-r2. I can't
see any links to the actual tarball though that would e
Powered by: Linux 2.6.11-gentoo-r7
18:14:37 up 12 days, 1:16, 4 users, load average: 0.31, 0.43, 0.51
Submitted By: Thomas Pegg
Date: 2005-10-27
Initial Package Version: 5.8.7
Origin: based on perl-5.8.7-libc-1.patch
Description: this patch adapts some hard-wired paths to the C library and point
While testing the new LFS LiveCD Makefile system, I ran across some
corrupted files downloaded from anduin via ftp.lfs-matrix.net, but have
confirmed that even downloading from anduin still results in
corruption.
The following files are affected:
openssl-0.9.7g.tar.bz2
tcl-8.4.11.tar.bz2
tk-8.4.1
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 18:11 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
> Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:56:17AM -0500:
> >
> > Can anyone check and see if this is the case on a recent build of
> > LFS to confirm this?
>
> Confirmed.Same permissions as yours Randy.
>
Can confirm this here
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hey All:
>
> Need some feedback on how exactly we're going to handle 64-bit in the
> Cross-LFS book, so bring on the comments! ;)
>
>
> However, now that 64-bit is gaining popularity in a number of archs, the
> question of how to handle that in the book comes up. For exa
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>
> Well it sounds like we'll have a good number of testers for the x86_64
> arch then :)
>
You can add me to the list of x86_64 testers. :)
--
Thomas
LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329
kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.9-1.667
08:22:44 up 3 days, 22:05, 2 users, loa
19 matches
Mail list logo
