Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Might be worth a shot. (If you have a system to test it on; don't go
> build something just for this.) OTOH that sed, or an equivalent, might
> have already been applied to pkg-config, or maybe they pulled in a newer
> version of popt.
Actually they dropped popt completely
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/31/12 6:17 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> It still amazes me that pkg-config requires any other external library.
>> glib1 wasn't bad since it was shipped alongside it and had no other
>> deps, fairly lightweight. But switching to glib2 was just ridiculous.
>> All that
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Maybe we can hack up the systemd package to install just udev, if
> there's no option to do that today? It'd be annoying to have to
> maintain that diff though.
I'm still hoping someone fixes this upstream. This is what Kay Sievers
said in April:
"After udev is merged into
Qrux wrote:
> @Markku...I meant no offense. I've always just assumed that devs
> work on the console in English, with a US keyboard layout. A lot of
> devs have to do that, since i18n isn't always a top prio for bleeding
> edge stuff (e.g., Xen). I just figured devs would choose the path of
> few
Qrux wrote:
> Does the vanilla kernel & userland require kbd to exist in order to
> use the console? If not, why does it exist as a part of LFS? Are
> there people with keyboards such that the default kernel driver
> (i.e., without kdb) cannot interpret certain keypresses?
>
> Even if so...Wh
On 10.1.2012 4:22, Ken Moffat wrote:
> For those who saw me moaning on lfs-book about libnl-2.0 (for me,
> NetworkManager doesn't build against it), a summary of what is going
> to happen:
>
> in LFS - nothing! Matt spotted that iproute2 only uses the
> headers, it doesn't link against the lib.
