Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin, can you get the mirrors to sync please.
>
I've updated the ftp repo, old and new md5 sums match the latest
commit. Packages will take about a day to propagate to all mirrors, but
my mirror again is up to date first manually:
http://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> I'd say yes, do a stealth update. (For reference: Make the bootscript
> and udev-config tarballs extract into a -6.3 directory, and rename the
> files themselves if they aren't already, get the new md5sums, fix
> packages.ent, and re-render the book to the website. Or let t
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You can read it online or you can download the book from to read it at
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.3/
>
The LFS FTP mirror is up-to-date, there is a 6.3 tarball of packages
available for download. It will take a bit of time to sync to all ftp
mirrors, but
For the ftp repos, I make heavy use of the wget scripts. Some are
already rendered with the book, such as:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/wget-list
If it isn't too much trouble, could this be added for blfs and hlfs as
well? The command is the same, "make wget-list" with
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> We're working on a getting a master server in place for mirroring the
> ISOs. We hope to have that up by the end of the week. That should help,
> but yes, I'm inclined to agree with your idea, Bruce. Something like
> that for each released CD could be very useful.
>
FYI,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry guys, I didn't intend to create a fire drill.
>
No prob, good to get it fixed up and prevent someone else from wasting
their time with an incomplete iso! :)
Justin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/fa
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Only lfslivecd-x86-6.3-r2014.iso looks wrong. BTW, old r snapshots
> and 6.3-pre1 (non-minimal) should be probably deleted
Whoops, it wasn't my intention for those to go live yet. osuosl.org
must have changed their system, before nothing went live until a prog
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> If we can't find the developer's canonical location, I'd really prefer
> anduin where we have complete control. For shadow, it is already there.
>
Sounds good, the lfs package repo won't be having that file be removed
for years, I still even have 6.0 packages in the rsync
Craig Jackson wrote:
> I can attest to this. I have been trying to get a good compatible
> build of LFS built on my Athlon 64 machine. I have had fun trying to
> get a good multilib build, but when it comes down to it, LFS is much
> more of a "known good" solution than CLFS, I assume this is most
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, that page is a bit dated. I have no idea if the mirrors are still
> accurate or not.
The credits page on the website:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/credits.html
Are all current mirrors for the lfs projects. I haven't gone through
and checked for dead mirrors in a bi
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, that sounds fine. Let me know when you think -rc2 should be released.
Just wanted to mention there is a 6.3-rc1 package tarball I generated a
couple days ago, will do one for rc2 as soon as it is out as well.
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/lfs-packages-6.3
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Looking at the repo today, it appears Justin got things caught up.
> Thanks, Justin! :-)
>
Yeah, sorry about that, thanks to Manuel for the wget-list makefile
target, I've been using that often, but haven't fully automated the repo
updates yet, but have ideas and am wo
12 matches
Mail list logo
