Sorry for the repeat, folks. I sent this the first time in an HTML
message, and evidently it took five days to get through the review
process. After two days, I resent it in plaintext, and that's what
spurred the conversation.
Please ignore.
- Jon
On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:15 PM
Gentlemen,
Forgive a novice to this list. I couldn't find any mention of this,
so if it's already been talked about, I'm sorry.
Step 5.7 of the recent development book shows this step currently to
generate the specs file:
gcc -dumpspecs | sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/tools&@g
On Jul 12, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Greg Schafer wrote:
> I've done ppc builds
> myself and can confirm that specs files do indeed differ per arch
> and GCC
> version. Of course, even the *name* of the dynamic linker is
> different for
> ppc.
THAT'S what I wanted to know. Yes, I know that x86 uses
show up at the beginning of the
line? They don't for me.
- Jon
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jon Fullmer wrote:
>
>> When putting this system for a non-x86 (PowerPC, to be specific), I
>> noticed that this setup is actually wrong.
>
> You may wan
Gentlemen,
Forgive a novice to this list. I couldn't find any mention of this,
so if it's already been talked about, I'm sorry.
Step 5.7 of the recent development book shows this step currently to
generate the specs file:
gcc -dumpspecs | sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/tools&@g' \
