On Monday 13 March 2006 21:56, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
> > It also matches -u{8,16,32,64} and changes them to __u{8,16,32,64}
>
> Hrm. Check this again. Are the '-u{8,16,32,64}' matches perhaps diffs of
> existing lines of 'u{8,16,32,64}' being removed the better sed? I think
On Monday 13 March 2006 17:37, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Why not use \< (start of word anchor) instead of \b (whatever \b is)?
Haven't seen \< yet, but I think its the same as \b (word boundary).
Florian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratc
On Monday 13 March 2006 16:10, Florian Schanda wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 March 2006 04:21, Jim Gifford wrote:
> > available at http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers.
>
> You can replace the long sed with the following:
>
> -e 's/\bu8/__u8/g' \
> -e 's/\bu16/_
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 04:21, Jim Gifford wrote:
> available at http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers.
You can replace the long sed with the following:
-e 's/\bu8/__u8/g' \
-e 's/\bu16/__u16/g' \
-e 's/\bu32/__u32/g' \
-e 's/\bu64/__u64/g' \
-e 's/\bs8/__s8/g' \
-e 's/\bs16/__s16/g' \
-e 's/\b
